Enbridge is arguing that Canada's pipelines are running at capacity.
In that case, Enbridge's argument has backfired, since rather than building more contentious pipelines, we should take seriously the option of transporting Canada's energy resources using existing rail infrastructure as argued in this Huffington Post article from yesterday.
4 comments:
Derailment. Look it up.
Enbridge: A decade of oil pipeline spills. Look it up:
http://www.watershedsentinel.ca/content/enbridge-spills
Oil quizz for dummies: Do oil tankers keep pumping after they've derailed in the same way that pipelines do after they've sprung a leak?
Hey Enbridge , as Dr Sheldon Cooper would say 'Bzzzzingaaaaa"
Dr Mike Popovich
The Rat
You obviously know little about railways and their ability to move heavy oil safer and cheaper that pipelines.
In a free market system why is the Government support one industry (pipeliens) over another (railways)?
Also, the governments have pissed away billions of dollars in lost royalties and other taxes by not getting on with it and supporting the rail option to diversify markets.
Railhound
Post a Comment